Starbucks’ 2006 Corporate Social Responsibility report promises a "great work environment" and notes that it expects its suppliers to respect "the rights of individuals" and to adhere to international standards regarding worker treatment, but the Seattle-based caffeine retailer reportedly fell a little short in its stance toward some of its U.S. employees who may have been exercising their lawful rights to support unionization efforts at some Starbucks locations. 
Democracy in the Workplace 
Supreme Court Affirms Broader Employee Protections in Bias Cases
Justices state federal workers protected from retaliation in age-bias complaints
Two U.S. Supreme Court rulings bolster workers’ protections against retaliation in age discrimination and racial bias cases, respectively, according to published reports.
WSJ: Starbucks Mugs Some Employees' Workplace Rights
Corporate Responsibility | Democracy in the Workplace | TheCRO Blog
Starbucks’ 2006 Corporate Social Responsibility report promises a "great work environment" and notes that it expects its suppliers to respect "the rights of individuals" and to adhere to international standards regarding worker treatment, but the Seattle-based caffeine retailer reportedly fell a little short in its stance toward some of its U.S. employees who may have been exercising their lawful rights to support unionization efforts at some Starbucks locations.
Starbucks’ 2006 Corporate Social Responsibility report promises a "great work environment" and notes that it expects its suppliers to respect "the rights of individuals" and to adhere to international standards regarding worker treatment, but the Seattle-based caffeine retailer reportedly fell a little short in its stance toward some of its U.S. employees who may have been exercising their lawful rights to support unionization efforts at some Starbucks locations.
Copyright © 2006-2010 CRO Corp, LLC. All rights reserved.